Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of latent heat of melting CA–MA–PA/xG with another component in literature

From: Effects of various types of graphite on the thermal conductivity and energy storage properties of ternary eutectic fatty acid-based composite as phase change material

PCM

Material

Melting

temp (°C)

Loading %

Pure PCM latent heat (J/g)

PCM composite latent heat (J/g)

Effective

ratio (%)

References

CA

EG

27.80

20

172.42

132.64

76.9

Sari et al. (2008)

PA

EG

60.88

20

194.45

148.36

76.29

Sari and Karaipekli (2009)

LA–PA–SA

EP

31.8

45

151.6

81.5

53.75

Zhang et al. (2014c)

LA–MA–PA/VMT

EG

30.6

2

151.6

72.7

47.95

Zhang et al. (2015)

LA–MA–PA

EG

30.94

5.3

145.3

135.9

93.53

Zhang et al. (2013)

LA–MA–SA

EG

29.05

7.69

140.9

137.1

97.30

Liu et al. (2014)

Paraffin

xGnP

50.8

5

128.8

131.5

102.57

Liu et al. (2014)

PA–SA

CNT

53.59

8

179

165

92.17

Zhang et al. (2014b)

CA–MA–PA

EG

18.61

7.69

135.6

128.2

94.54

Yuan et al. (2014b)

CA–MA–PA

xG-F

17.5

5

148.7

143.7

96.63

Current study

  1. CNT carbon nanotube, EG expanded graphite, EP expanded perlite