Skip to main content

Table 9 Comparative analysis of the predicted standard deviation by each method and the measured standard deviation

From: Influence of Weibull parameters on the estimation of wind energy potential

Methods

Site 1

Site 2

Site 3

Std

RE

std

RE

std

RE

GM

0.46285

0.01333

1.70726

0.02489

2.32308

0.11220

EMJ

0.45539

0.00301

1.74060

0.00584

2.08934

0.00030

EML

0.45540

0.00297

1.74100

0.00561

2.08898

0.00013

EPFM

0.47287

0.03527

1.79331

0.02426

2.17038

0.03910

MM

0.45676

0

1.75083

0

2.08872

0

MLM

0.46652

0.02137

1.77133

0.01171

2.06885

0.00951

MMLM

0.46652

0.02137

1.77133

0.01171

2.06885

0.00951

AMLM

0.45864

0.00412

1.71306

0.02158

2.24395

0.07432

LSM

0.46186

0.01117

1.70569

0.02578

2.32249

0.11192

WLSM

0.42434

0.07097

1.64311

0.06152

2.08546

0.00156

CFM

0.45645

0.00067

1.74665

0.00239

2.09141

0.00129

WVM

0.83593

0.83013

2.35735

0.34642

3.41715

0.63601

MoroM

0.98330

1.15276

2.09691

0.19766

2.64376

0.26573

MQM

0.35991

0.21203

1.44682

0.17364

2.10518

0.00788

Measured

0.45676

–

1.47180

–

1.69784

–